Search for: "White Mountain Apache Tribe" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2009, 11:12 am
According to theday.com, "An Arizona Indian tribe is suing the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation in tribal court, alleging the Mashantuckets' Pequot Plus Health Benefit Services mishandled the White Mountain Apache Tribe's medical claims in 2007 and 2008. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In deciding whether preemption was the legally required outcome, the Court looked to and applied the landmark preemption analysis case White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:09 am by Native American Rights Fund
We added two new bills: S.2953: Indian Health Service Accountability Act of 2016.S.2959: A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 6:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§§ 261-263) or the Bracker balancing test (see White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:31 pm by NARF
S.3168/H.R.5880 - A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to modify the enforceability date for certain provisions, and for other purposes. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 7:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Plaintiff argues that our cursory preemption analysis there is clearly irreconcilable with White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:47 am
The opinion is particularly notable in that examines three independent bases for its substantive holding: (1) federal pre-emption under the Indian Trader Statutes; (2) federal pre-emption under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; and, (3) the balancing test that the US Supreme Court articulated in White Mountain Apache v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:47 am
The opinion is particularly notable in that examines three independent bases for its substantive holding: (1) federal pre-emption under the Indian Trader Statutes; (2) federal pre-emption under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; and, (3) the balancing test that the US Supreme Court articulated in White Mountain Apache v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:08 am by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html The following bills were added:S.2850: A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2020 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm by NARF
Arizona Department of Revenue (White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 7:03 am by Kate Fort
Reg. 10909 The designated agent and address for the White Mountain Apache Tribe was “Cora Hinton, ICWA Representative/CPS Supervisor, P.O. [read post]